Windpower – Renewable Energy

I was pleased to read in yesterday’s Wall St. Journal that financing the next round of wind turbine – at least for Suzlon – is less of a problem than might have been expected in such a turbulent economy.

In the past, I worked on a technology map for wind power and discovered that there were over 10,000 patents in the space.  There are some interesting resources on the European Wind Energy Association website.  Wind power is hardly a new technology and it certainly is ready for more wide spread commercial use.

Posted in Renewable Energy | Leave a comment

LifeScience Alley: A model for cooperation & education

Last week,  I had the chance to speak to a group convened jointly by LifeScience Alley (LSA) in Minneapolis, MN and the Society for Competitive Intelligence Professionals (SCIP).    It was my first encounter with LSA and I must say I’m impressed, intrigued and inspired.

If ever there were a way to foster local cross-company collaboration and local innovation, LSA is a good model.

LifeScience Alley offers programs to help association members and non-members a variety of programs to help them stay up to date.   It also fosters networking among businesses  and professionals in the greater Minneapolis area.  LSA has a trade show coming up in December which also involves local college students.

Take a look!

Posted in CTI & Technology Analytics Methods | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Technorati Claim Code

This blog is registering on Technorati.
fn7gbpsimw

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Choosing a Study Area

Choosing an area to study is often one of the easiest parts of a competitive technical intelligence ( CTI ) problem.  In reality, this gets to the heart of what competitive intelligence and business analytics ( BA ) can deliver.  Below is a partial list.

Research & Development

  • Where should we invest?
  • What programs and new ideas should we support?
  • Which programs should we slow down or terminate?
  • What technologies fit our company’s risk tolerance?
  • What pathways are blocked?  Which pathways are open and free (white spaces)?

Competitive Analysis & Strategy Analysis

  • Are there strategic threats we should be aware of?
  • What areas are my competitors investing in?
  • What is/was my competitor’s R&D structure?
  • What is the creative potential of my vendors?
  • Can we block competitors?  Building IP fences!

Business Development & Licensing

  • Are there patents we should be licensing to control our destiny?
  • What Technologies should we be acquiring?
  • What Companies/Universities should we partner with?

Strategic IP Management

  • Identify key areas of  IP areas
  • How should we manage our IP?

How else can we use competitive technical intelligence and business analytics?   Please post your thoughts.

Posted in CTI & Technology Analytics Methods | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Why Does Technology Mapping and CTI Work?

Technology mapping and analysis with competitive technical intelligence depends on public disclosure of technically significant information.   What organization would do such a thing?   Answer.  Both large and small organizations!   BUT, you must be prepared to organize the disclosures AND you must be prepared to interpret the disclosures to make them tell a story.

What motivates organizations to disclose “sensitive” information?   Below are some of the forces. What other forces can you identify?  Please add a comment.

  • Big business needs to convince investors that they are leaders and worthy of investment.  As a result, businesses publish useful information in press releases, annual reports and financial documents.
  • Small businesses disclose information in order to raise money.
  • Businesses seek patent protection for products and product improvements as a form of strategic advantage.
  • Businesses publish to gain strategic advantage.
  • Scientist and engineers are often evaluated on their publication and patenting frequency.  As a result, there is “pressure” from below to disclose technology information.
  • Patenting and publishing timeframes are similar or shorter that product development cycles in many organizations.
  • Others?

Competitive Technical Intelligence also benefits from the fact that scientific and patent information is very highly structured.   Patents and scientific papers have informative titles and abstracts.  Patents have claims which summarize the invention.  Papers have conclusions with a similar summary function.  The well structured formats make text mining and mapping fairly convenient.

Posted in CTI & Technology Analytics Methods | Tagged | 2 Comments

Organizational Impacts of Technology Mapping and CTI

In 1996, McGonagle and Vella (A New Archetype for Competitive Intelligence, Quorum Books, Westport Connecticut) published their thoughts on the organization of corporate intelligence.   Their thoughts are summarized in the table below.   My assessment of the impact of technology mapping and CTI methods are shown in the last column.

Intelligence Area Function Impact
Competitive Intelligence Competitor investments capabilities, intentions Very High
Strategic Intelligence Corporate radar, providing early warning Very High
Crisis Management Shocks, disasters and sudden changes Medium
Benchmarking Quantifying and comparing Medium
Reverse Engineering Product analysis Medium
Defensive (counter) Intelligence Corporate security Low
Market Intelligence Segments and sales Low

I believe that the impact of technology mapping and CTI on an organization can very broad.  Below are some thoughts on where a good technology map and competitive analysis can benefit organizations.

  • Management can see why a project is not a leap of faith.
  • Investors can see why the idea makes business sense and why it is strategically useful.
  • Business Development can negotiate from a strong position, knowing more than the other side.
  • Project Leaders can prove that ideas are fundamentally sound before proposing a project.
  • Project Teams can judge new ideas and new information in an agreed upon context.

What other impacts have you experienced?

Posted in CTI & Technology Analytics Methods | Tagged | 5 Comments

Introducing Technology Mapping and CTI

From my perspective competitive technical intelligence (CTI), strategic technology analysis, technology mapping and business analytics are almost synonyms.   CTI is a business process in which science and technology information is formulated to provide answers to business questions about

  • new products,
  • the readiness of technology for commercialization,
  • M&A support and due diligence,
  • technology investments,
  • the basis for competition in an area and the
  • readiness of competitors to actually compete.

From my perspective, technology mapping and business analytics are implicit in the CTI process.

Technology mapping is a form of business analytics.  Technology mapping is also a key process in competitive technical intelligence projects.   Technology mapping allows trends in technology to be visualized.  Once trends become visualized, it becomes easier for scientists, engineers and their managers or investors to jointly understand their options, to reach consensus on strategy and to take appropriate actions.  The result is better, more accurate and faster strategic technology decisions.

Strategic technology decisions will be even more important in the future.  The IBM 2008 CEO Study describes the enterprise of the future as “hungry for change, wildly imaginative, disruptive by nature and … wired into the people who matter the most”.   I believe that the enterprise of the future will also need to be fluent in CTI methods and the use of technology mapping to understand its options.   Organizations that actually implement this vision will be exciting places to work in the future.

Posted in CTI & Technology Analytics Methods | Tagged | 1 Comment

Discovering Competitive Technical Intelligence

I believe that competitive technical intelligence (CTI) is one of the best kept secrets on the planet! I discovered competitive technical intelligence as a fortuitous career accident in the 1980’s.  My story is below.  I’d like to hear how you discovered the utility of competitive technical intelligence or business analytics.

To learn more about CTI, join us in Minneapolis on September 18th for a half-day workshop that is sponsored by SCIP and LifeScience Alley and is presented by Patent Insights.

Here’s my story.   After finishing my post-doc, I joined the staff at Miles Laboratories, a subsidiary of Bayer.  I was given a piece of photographic film, the image receiving layer.  Remember the old peel-off instant pictures?  The part you peeled was the image receiving layer.  The idea was to make a test for whole blood glucose for diabetics using photographic technology know-how.

To make a long story short, it wasn’t too long before I needed a coating machine to gain consistency in my coatings.  There were old, mothballed, spare machines in at Agfa-Gevaert (also a subsidiary of Bayer) in Germany.  So, I went to Germany to stay for a week and came home nearly three years later.

It turned out that my project was originally the idea of Dr. K.W. Schranz, then Head of Organic Chemistry R&D at Agfa and a rather senior manager.  It was Dr. Schranz who TAUGHT me, a very junior scientist, that patents could be strategic technology indicators and that I could predict what would happen in the future by looking at groups of patents and understanding how corporations and industries behaved.

While I was at Bayer in Germany, I learned another key lesson.  There were (and still are) experts everywhere.   I learned that didn’t need to know everything myself, but I needed to know where to find the expert who knew the answer that I needed.

Both lessons were taught to me in the mid-1980’s.  Put the two lessons together and you have Competitive Technical Intelligence mixed with Open Innovation, a powerful combination that works even better in today’s information age.  I’ve now incorporated CTI into each project on which I’ve worked, ~30 years of experience.

What is your story?  How did you find CTI?  How has it impacted your career?  What lessons would you pass along?

Posted in CTI & Technology Analytics Methods | Tagged , , | 31 Comments

Intelligence Alphabet Soup

I’ve been preparing for a presentation and preparing to review of the similarities and differences among CTI (competitive technical intelligence), CI (competitive intelligence), BI (business intelligence) and BA (business analytics). In the process, I’ve been looking at websites, presentations, papers and books to find cohesive definitions of each area. Interestingly, it seems to me that the many definitions of the areas are so broad that the differences among CTI, CI, BI and BA are nearly invisible.

Sometimes, when words don’t work, a picture or an engineering diagram can help. The diagram below came from my review of major BI and CI participant’s websites and blogs and from a review of the patents in all four areas. Consider this to be a draft.

I would greatly appreciate your thoughts on whether the picture accurately reflects the differences and similarities among CTI, CI, BI and BA. How might you alter it? After a while, I’ll report on suggestions on this blog.

PPT version PDF version

DRAFT diagram of similarities and differences among BI, BA, CI and CTI
Posted in CTI & Technology Analytics Methods | Tagged , , , | 6 Comments

Patent Insights

Welcome to Patent Insights’ new blog.

Patent Insights provides technology mapping services to help you make faster, more confident technology selection or technology investment decisions.

Our custom research focuses on your new product development problem or your technology investment, licensing, merger or acquisition challenge.   TechTriage Notes are published reports on new, rapidly emerging technology areas and are ideal starting points to help you get acquainted with a new area.

Our unique business analytics tools and years of experience save you:  Time, Money and Resources.

Posted in CTI & Technology Analytics Methods | Tagged , , , | 11 Comments